We show our work.
Before we ask you to trust a bioreactor with your process, we try to break it. These are the tests: the method, the numbers, and what didn't work.
Six rules for every note on this page.
- 01Pass criteria first.
Written down before anything is measured. If the result misses, it misses.
- 02Try to break it.
Crashes, second screens, wrong inputs, trick questions. A test that can only confirm is not a test.
- 03Every number has a record.
A log line, a database row or a screenshot behind each figure, recalculated from the raw files.
- 04A second pair of eyes.
The claims that matter most are re-checked by someone who did not run the test.
- 05What failed, and what we changed.
A failure is published with its fix and the re-test, or with what we decided instead.
- 06Real or simulated, on the label.
Every note says what ran on real hardware and what was simulated.
From the bench
Can an AI assistant run on the bench PC, offline, and never write without asking?
94 of 106 real-voice requests right, 7.6 s to answer. A second review corrected three of our own numbers and found a near miss. Here is what changed.
Offline, on rented and in-house hardware · simulated E. coli batchRead the note →We tried to break our own control software
49 pieces of evidence. The safety layer held. Three data-integrity gaps found and fixed the same day, then re-tested on the bench.
Real controller and sensors · water, no culture, no gasesRead the note →- Oxygen control with real gas flowHow fast and how steady, when the culture's demand changes.
- The assistant on live batch dataThe same exam, with real sensors behind the answers.
- kLa, measured by the reactor itselfThe test set up by talking to it, run on its own, report written for you.
- A full shift, unattendedThe control software, left alone for hours.
Want to see a test run live?
In a demo we show the hardware, the interface and the agent, and the records behind these numbers.
Book a demo